Design a minimal set of note types with specific purposes: concept, question, argument, method, pattern, or source. Each type suggests characteristic fields and expected links, guiding consistent thinking without heavy bureaucracy. Keep the ontology flexible by documenting when and why a rule bends. Periodically review whether categories still help. If not, merge or rename. The goal is shared expectations across your notes so they collaborate like teammates instead of competing for attention or breeding confusion.
Tag with intent, not compulsion. Prefer tags that drive actions or views, like review-frequency, project-stage, or domain. Avoid broad, fuzzy labels that accumulate everywhere and signal nothing. When a tag grows too big, split it or promote a hub note summarizing its scope. Combine tags with queries to surface timely work: drafts needing links, claims lacking evidence, or orphans awaiting adoption. By aligning tags with real workflows, you transform metadata into momentum rather than maintenance overhead.
All Rights Reserved.